Compiled by RACHNA LAL
Welcome to Hard Talk, where we pose questions to both top executives and budding entrepreneurs on some of the major issues involving business.
The upgrade of the Savusavu airport runway has long been debated, surrounded by increasing controversy.
Savusavu Tourism Association is pushing for the upgrade of the runway. It has engaged an expert airport engineer to come up with what it says is a viable plan.
It says the upgrade is needed because the limitations of the current runway stifle tourism investment and stop the spread of the tourism dollar in the North.
The first stage being proposed is to reclaim the area required to extend the existing runway.
The proposal also is for the terminal to be relocated and upgraded adjacent to the ‘new’ apron area that was built in 2008.
The association is positive of getting more tourists and investment into Savusavu once the runway is upgraded. It would, it says, allow for bigger more comfortable planes and what is says will be much more reliable access.
That in turn, it says, will be the catalyst for unlocking investment held up because of concerns over air services between Nadi International Airport and Savusavu.
Our main domestic airline, Pacific Sun, currently flies its Twin Otter aircraft to Savusavu.
The Savusavu Tourism Association says Pacific Sun can only uplift 12 to 14 passengers with ‘most’ of their baggage ex Nadi for Northern destinations.
Airports Fiji Limited, the entity responsible for all our regular airports, says it is not saying the Savusavu Runway will not be extended.
But it says rather that the proposed design by the association can be a bit risky.
Airports Fiji says it could go ahead if the Savusavu Tourism Association members unequivocally guarantee the design they are proposing for the runway and any consequences arising from it.
We spoke to the following people from Savusavu Tourism Association, Airports Fiji Limited and Pacific Sun on this issue:
r Savusavu Tourism Association: Head of Association’s Airport Development Team – Pilot Tim Eden
r Airports Fiji Limited – Chairman – Faiz Khan
r Pacific Sun – General Manager – Shaenaz Voss
1. Fiji Sun to Mr Eden: What are your concerns with Airports Fiji?
Tim Eden: Our release (Fiji Sun November 28, 2013) was in response to comments made in the Fiji Sun, dated November 20, 2013 where chairman of Airports Fiji, Faiz Khan, mentioned that: “AFL was appreciative of Government’s allocation of $600,000 in the 2014 Budget to upgrade Outer Island Airports”.
However, in the very next sentence he stated that “Savusavu will not be extended”.
The timing of this release, coincidently, was a day prior to a meeting Savusavu Tourism Association had with Airports Fiji Limited regarding the extension of Savusavu runway.
Further, Airports Fiji stated that: “It is uncommon for any organisation to come up with such a plan as STA has”.
STA agrees, it is uncommon, however we refer to it as ‘an initiative’, something that Government has been stressing for quite some time – don’t wait on handouts from Government.
So STA took the initiative to do something about it, beginning some ten years ago.
2. Fiji Sun to Mr Khan: Why did you say the $600,000 allocated in the 2014 National Budget for outer island airstrips will not be used for the Savusavu Runway upgrade?
Faiz Khan: We have never said that Savusavu runway will not be extended. What we have said is that the $600,000 2014 Budget allocation for outer islands is not for Savusavu extension.
Is Savusavu Tourism Association claiming that they can extend Savusavu runway from a budget pool of $600,000 for all outer islands?
3. Fiji Sun to Mr Eden: Tell us about the association’s proposal and the consultant engaged to develop the proposal?
Mr Eden: Previous Airports Fiji figures to extend the runway have been in the $13 million to $15 million range.
Savusavu Tourism Association has engaged an expert engineer who has designed and built numerous runways in Australia, using the latest technology, including remote solar power emergency installations, over the past two years.
Savusavu Tourism Association has a current day estimate of $2.5 million to complete the extension with the existing width, which will make Savusavu more operationally safe than it has ever been.
Savusavu Tourism Association has also offered to look into the liability aspect of the works, despite already saving AFL some $10 million in the overall process.
It is an opportunity that Airports Fiji and ultimately our Government will never get again, ie basically a development at cost.
4. Fiji Sun to Mr Khan: Why can’t Airports Fiji agree to this proposal?
Mr Khan: Please note that Savusavu Tourism Association’s initiative does not propose to pay for Savusavu runway extension.
Savusavu Tourism Association is asking Airports Fiji to pay based on Savusavu Tourism Association’s design.
The simple issue is whether Savusavu Tourism Association members will take responsibility for its design and delivery and any consequences that flow from it.
Therefore Savusavu Tourism Association’s comments on it taking initiative away from Government handout culture, is irresponsible and miscued.
Airports Fiji’s directives from Government is simply to ensure that capital expenditures are well spent and we receive value for money whether it be by way of a business case or in the name of national economic development.
Without any warranties and guarantees from the Savusavu Tourism Association members of their proposed design, we cannot be certain of value.
We cannot just build/spend, as Savusavu Tourism Association proposes, and wait and see if airlines that do not even exist at the moment deliver on their promises to fly there.
We also cannot be blind to the fact that Pacific Sun (soon to be Fiji Link) is the only airline that truly flies domestically and has rejected Savusavu Tourism Association’s design proposal.
Airports Fiji is simply asking all Savusavu Tourism Association members to unequivocally guarantee the design they propose for Savusavu runway extensions and any consequences arising from it and see how Airports Fiji will make Savusavu Tourism Association’s proposal possible.
Airports Fiji assures to assist Savusavu Tourism Association once that is done.
5. Fiji Sun to Mr Eden: There are certain standards required by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). Will the association’s runway upgrade proposal be compliant?
Mr Eden: The chairman (Mr Khan) mentions ICAO as the yard stick to any development. If the same ‘ICAO guidelines’ were to be applied over all existing aerodromes in Fiji, it would spell the end of aviation in Fiji.
There are no aerodromes in Fiji that are totally ICAO compliant - Nausori remains black listed, Labasa has it’s restrictions, not to mention many of the grass tracks on Outer Islands that have served the public for decades.
At the end of the day, it is the airlines who decide where they will land their aircraft, with or without restrictions (these days referred to as risk assessment/management) to which the Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji will confirm compliance.
6. Fiji Sun to Mr Khan: Do you agree the outer island airstrips in Fiji are not entirely ICAO-compliant?
Mr Khan: It is irresponsible of Savusavu Tourism Association to say that most outer island airstrips are not ICAO compliant so let Airports Fiji spend millions to build another ICAO non-compliant runway in Savusavu.
The traffic on some of the smaller outer island runways is low and airlines only fly when conditions suit them. This is the same for low frequency grass track runway aerodromes around the world.
It is an irony that Savusavu Tourism Association wants runway extension at Savusavu with a view to more frequent and bigger size aircrafts, yet it implies that it is okay for their design to be ICAO non compliant and risk airline frequency.
7. Fiji Sun to Mr Eden: What are your concerns about Pacific Sun and what do you propose?
Mr Eden: Savusavu Tourism Association would like to mention that Pacific Sun is not the only airline in the country that operates domestically.
It is no better time these operators put their hands up and make submissions to Airports Fiji regarding their operational requirements.
Perhaps Pacific Sun should look at an aircraft type other than the ATR42, perhaps the DASH 8 100-200 is more suited to domestic operations, many of which operate in Papua New Guinea’s challenging environment.
Whatever way it’s looked at, destinations such as Taveuni and Savusavu have out grown and deserve better than the existing services.
The Savusavu Tourism Association members are hard at work upgrading properties, have future plans for expansion, and are convincing potential investors to invest in this beautiful part of the Country.
This is the very reason we are taking the ‘initiative’ and paving the way for more efficient services.
Its time Government and Airports Fiji find a way to exploit these opportunities. The word ‘impossible’ is not in our Savusavu Tourism Association dictionary.
8. Fiji Sun to Ms Voss: What are your views on the comments made by the Savusavu Tourism Association and their proposal?
Shaenaz Voss: We have to date not seen any firm designs and for that matter cannot comment on if the design does or does not meet our operational performance requirements.
In order to determine the safe performance of ATR42-500 into Savusavu, we would first require Type A chart of the aerodrome from which ATR professionals will determine the requirements.
Pacific Sun is happy to work alongside Airports Fiji on any developments they undertake and will also assist with technical resources required such as pilot input and performance data.
Pacific Sun’s fleet review/plan is not based on any individual or associations requirements but on extensive fleet studies which take into account safety, aircraft operational performance and commercial viability.